
CURAT3D: Eli Scheinman - Weaving Technology with Art, the Craft of Storytelling, and Curation
Summary
Send us a text This week, we had the pleasure of sitting down with Eli Scheinman, Head of Art at Proof, where we discussed the delicate dance of storytelling in the art world and its impact on the era of digital art collecting . Storytelling is more than just a buzzword; it's a craft that injects life into artwork, creating a bond between creator and collector, and Eli does it with a combination of integrity and strategy, adding necessary dimensions to powerful stories. Navigating the crypto...Speaker 1: GM, this is Boone and
you're listening to the
Schiller Curated Podcast.
In this week's episode, we sat
down with Eli Scheinman, head of
art at Proof.
We discussed many important
topics, such as the dimensions
and challenges of authentic
storytelling, physical prints as
an onboarding mechanism for
traditional art collectors, the
importance of understanding an
artist's creative process and
much, much more.
As always, this podcast is for
entertainment purposes only and
should not be relied upon for
financial advice.
Boone and guest may own NFTs
discussed.
Now grab some coffee and let's
dive into this conversation with
Eli.
All right, we are live in, eli.
Gm.
Sir, how are you?
Speaker 2: GM, gm, I'm doing
well, man.
I'm excited to chat and it was
so nice to see you in Miami in
person for the first time.
Excited to dig in.
This should be a lot of fun,
dude.
Speaker 1: I mean, we actually
had the pleasure of hanging out
multiple times, whether it was
in the car, whether it was at
the Proof house, whether it was
at the Schiller house.
We started off right away.
I mean it was really great to
land in Miami and then go hang
out with you guys.
That was my first event.
It was a lot of fun, man.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it was great.
You guys had this wonderful
setup.
Without saying too much.
You had these two houses that
were adjacent to each other and
always good vibes every time we
went over there.
Best vibes at the Schiller
house.
Speaker 1: Thanks, man.
I mean we really try and it's
cool to hear that reciprocated
when people pick up what we're
trying to put down, and we're
really grateful to be doing what
we do.
I joined Schiller in January
and I still just pinch myself
that this is what we get to do
for a living.
Speaker 2: Just to react to that
for a moment.
It's amazing the quality of
humans that are on your team.
Yes, you obviously.
I mean everyone knows that
about you.
You're a high-intensity good
human.
But I met Connor, I met
Bernardo, I spent time with
Fungi in person for the first
time.
I might be missing oh, eli,
there's an Eli on your team and
just all very high-intensity
good humans, and so it was fun
to see that in person get to
spend time together.
Speaker 1: Man, thank you.
I mean, that's really when I
was debating, whether you know,
like when we were kind of in
chats about me joining, it was
just like that was what I always
came back to is like there was
not one person that I didn't
look up to in a certain way,
someone that didn't operate with
high integrity, someone who
said no to things that they
didn't vibe with.
You know someone, who you know
people.
It just I hadn't really met a
more cohesive team and every
time I kept finding some you
know risks or challenges.
I'm like it kept the whole.
Every time I poked a hole, the
hole filled right back up.
So it was like I couldn't find
a reason to not want to join
this team.
Like I really, you know, I
really tried just to make sure I
did my due diligence, but it's
been one of the best decisions I
ever made.
It's.
These guys are just absolutely
stacked and it's been quite the
year, man, and I'm sure you know
you can quite attest to that as
well with all the Grails
launches, with all the things
you guys have been doing at
Proof.
I mean I told you earlier like
I've had to mostly just watch
from the sidelines for a lot of
things, but getting to see, like
what you guys have built,
especially on the art side you
guys have worked with some of my
favorite artists and the way
you guys do Grails and the way
you guys are, the amount of
intent and the amount of effort,
especially on the media side,
it's obviously very personal to
me, you know, as I am the
director of media at Schiller.
So from that standpoint I don't
think anyone holds a candle.
So it's, I appreciate that man.
Yeah, dude, it's, and I know
it's not cheap, I know it's
really hard, I know it's a lot
of work to do.
Speaker 2: It's a lot of work
and you know, first of all,
appreciate that and then, yeah,
man, it is a lot of work but and
a lot of the work is certainly
not done by me you know, we have
such an amazing in-house media
team led by our director of
media, mauricio, who you should
definitely meet and time with.
He's outstanding, he's built a
great team.
But what we we have internally
is a really deep commitment to
doing the work to to effectively
tell those artist stories.
That feels like, you know,
there's some white space there.
There's an opportunity there to
really lean in and tell those
stories in a way in which the
artists have not had them told
before, and that you know.
That, I think, from a collector
perspective, is valuable and
important and it all feeds into
this, this paradigm where you
and I and all of us are trying
to build.
That broadens the accessibility
of digital art and and the
digital artists who are in the
space today.
But it's also, from the artist
perspective, you know, I think,
a fundamental reason why working
with Proof and releasing work
with us is of interest, because
you know to be totally
transparent and frank, most of
the artists who release work in
those grails shows that you
mentioned and we did three of
them last year and we've done
five in total.
You know they don't need us,
they don't need, frankly, any
platform to release work and and
effectively sell it.
You know these are artists who
have an existing collector base
and their own audiences.
The reason they find what we're
doing, I think, attractive and
interesting is is exactly for
that, that core reason around
the storytelling and media side
of it.
That's valuable to them and so,
by extension, doing a show like
that it is interesting.
But just to double click even
further, you know, when we
started doing those grail shows
in in season one in particular,
I would say the sort of primary
experience from a collector
perspective was about the
guessing game and the
speculation.
Yeah, you know who could it be.
Yeah, what does that mean in
terms of you know what I might,
might make in terms of being
able to sell the piece that I've
minted and the whole project
and and experience I think was
was pretty deeply rooted in that
from the collector experience.
And what we've tried to do over
the course of the last several
of those shows is to move a
little further away from that
being the primary focus into.
This is fundamentally about
storytelling and that feels much
more aligned for me and I think
us as a, as an organization, is
that's the work we want to be
doing Totally, man and I was.
Speaker 1: There was a couple of
thoughts that went through my
head while you were saying that
in the word that kept keeps
coming to mind is dimensions.
You know, it's like the,
because I look at, I look at a
piece of art and that to me, is
only one dimension of the story
they're trying to tell.
You know, you could argue and I
still think it's a gray area,
but you know there's, you could
argue, the words that the artist
puts, you know, on on social
media or on on the Super Air
Prairie Drone Foundation, as
another dimension, yeah, and I
think that when you look at them
talking about the piece in the
space as another dimension.
But there's, you know, and I
think you, you and I probably
align on this really well is
that there's some parts of the
storytelling that doesn't feel
like the artist's job and it
feels like that's other people's
jobs to tell that story from an
entirely different lens in a
really unique and captivating
way.
Because you look at the artist's
role I mean, at least the way I
look at it is that there's so
much that goes into being an
artist, and especially in the
digital age, not that being an
artist was ever easy.
You know, the the opportunity to
make a footprint here is really
, as you said, there's a lot of
white space to make a footprint
but at the same time I think a
lot of people are realizing that
there's there's a lot more work
to it than really meets the eye
, yeah, and so so to see that
was really fun and I'm really
glad that you touched on kind of
where where you guys rooted in
the very beginning of season one
and I think you know, in an
interesting way.
I think it's great that you guys
started like that and then
pivoted, but you still kind of
kept a little bit of that ethos
in there, because I think that
still, as much as we are in it
for the art and the storytelling
, crypto as a whole is a
financial market and like it
almost kind of feels like an ode
to the culture to have a little
bit like a hint of that in
there, kind of like what Dave
Krugman did with drip drop, you
know like how he created.
Very similar to that there's an
ode to like the speculative
nature of the space, but it is
inherently a larger body of work
that tells a much bigger story
and I think finding useful ways
to implement that without making
it to primary focus is
incredible.
You know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, no,
I think that made sense and
like so I think that's true.
And then the other thing I
would tease out there is in the
way that that mechanic around
Grail's works, going back to
your point around context and
those different dimensions, at
the beginning of that experience
, from the collector perspective
, the singular, the only
dimension that exists is the
visual output.
All you have to to build your
understanding of the piece of
the artwork from is the artwork
itself no title, artist name, no
description.
And then, over the course of
the process, you increasingly
get those additional dimensions,
ultimately leading to robust
storytelling title, description,
artist name and maybe some
additional context from them,
from themselves on Twitter's,
into that effect.
So I like the way you're
thinking about that in terms of
those, those different
dimensions.
You know, it's so interesting,
like I had a conversation
yesterday with an artist that
we're working with and it was,
it was specific to that point
you made around what are the
roles and responsibilities, so
to speak, of an artist in this
space and in particular, as it
relates to communicating
externally about their work.
And you know we have a variety
of different distribution
opportunities that proof, we
have a podcast, we have our
Twitter account where we can do
spaces and other things.
We have our media site where we
can create, create video.
We have our Discord, our
token-gated Discord, where we
could do more intimate voice
chats, and I was having this
conversation with an artist
yesterday about whether those
any or all of those felt
authentic to them as a channel
for communicating about an
upcoming release or not.
And for them, in this specific
instance, most of those did not.
You know, they did not feel
authentic as opportunities for
them to express and communicate
about their work, and I actually
quite liked that, that an
artist felt that way and was
open to communicate that,
because I think, at least in
this space, most artists do the
same thing, which is I have a
drop coming up.
That means, by extension, I am
going to do a Twitter Spaces
three days before the drop or a
day before the drop and I'm
going to bring in some people to
that spaces that help signal.
This is an interesting like.
It's become a little bit
formulaic, and so to have an
artist be very candid with me
and say you know, I want
something that feels sort of
more of the project and of me
and more intimate and less
marketing, I love that.
And then then the challenges on
me and us meaning, you know,
proof to figure out, and then
I'm sure this is something you
guys think about is like how to
tell that story, how to
communicate those different
dimensions that we're circling
around in an authentic way and
in a per project way, so that it
does not feel formulaic and
that it actually feels additive
and an extension of the artwork
and concept more than anything.
I'm sure you know, at Schiller
you guys have different clients
and artists and projects where
if it were formulaic, it
wouldn't be interesting and you
probably have to really be
thoughtful about how you tell
those stories in very different
ways.
Speaker 1: You nailed it.
I mean you nailed it completely
, and that's really cool, that
it's also really interesting to
hear publicly that you know a
lot of the channels that we have
Don't feel native to, to the,
to the telling of the story, and
I'm really I appreciate you
sharing that, because it I think
we all Kind of know it, I think
we all kind of like feel it,
but it's not really something
that's spoken about a lot.
So I think, yeah, I'm just
gonna noodle on that for a
little bit, but the the point
around, you know, we and a
Schiller, we actually took the
first step to working with an
artist this past year was John
Carborn, and it was with the
seeker project.
And you know, because
historically in the past we
don't, you know, we, we never
worked with artists simply
because of the fact that we
didn't want to serve as An
additional middleman that was
extracting without providing
enough value to justify what we
were extracting.
You know, because you know we
all, we all got to eat.
We're not, you know, like we
have our own way of doing things
, but and so we all have what we
want to make, but we all we
also don't feel good about
charging too much For for what
we provide.
And John really came to us Kind
of knowing exactly what he
wanted but kind of struggling
with the, the presentation of it
, and so that was a great first
step into it.
But yeah, it was something it
was.
We treated him nothing like a
client.
You know, like it was very
different.
You know cuz John's not a
protocol, john's an artist.
You know.
John's not, you know, like an
art platform, john is an artist,
you know.
Speaker 2: So let me just react
to one other thing, which is,
you know, I think, one thing we,
excuse me, we wrestle with
quite a bit and we're we're sort
of learning as we go and and
have some good data points from
the last year is how much do you
as a you know, I think of proof
is some Some blend of
platforming gallerist.
So you know, how do we or
production partner is sort of
yeah, some version of those
three things how do we
effectively help sell and
package a release for an artist?
You know let's you know we were
just talking about John how do
we do that effectively in a way
that Tells the story but also
keeps the artwork that is at the
core of the entire thing front
and center?
And so, for example, we did one
release last year, earlier in
the year, where, upon reflection
, I think there was, there was
sort of too much branding Around
the release itself and, by
extension, the artwork, which
should have been the thing that
everyone was was focused on, was
focused on all the energy was
going into, actually got lost a
little bit because there were
these sort of superfluous Assets
and other things around it.
And so, finding that right
balance where you're, you're
telling a story, you're building
a mood, you're you're creating
an ethos and communicating that
ethos externally in a cogent way
and in a consistent way, but
always driving back to the
artwork fundamentally, yeah, is
is an interesting challenge.
Speaker 1: It really is, and I
think it's different for each
artist, you know, because an
artwork tells every, every body
of work tells an entirely
different story, and so, like
identifying what that is, how
can we tell that the most
authentically?
On the bird app, you know, or
on the ex app, or on whatever,
whatever other apps or whatever
whatever other distribution
channels that we, that we use?
It's it's fun, exciting, but,
like you said, it's incredibly
challenging because I imagine,
the way you, the way you guys
told you know summers, you know
summer story recently was very
different than how you guys told
some of the grails drops.
You know, like was very
different with how you did Joey
L's with was, which was very
different, you know I mean.
So it's yeah, I think you know
what I'm get.
I think the point I'm getting
at is that these are like, I
think they're almost some of the
funnest problems to have,
because I don't think I've been
so exciting to tackle a
challenge like this and it's
like.
These are really fun and the
fact that I think we're both in
a position to do that in a fun
way is really unique.
And so that kind of like lends
me to one of the just very,
really curious about you and
your journey.
Like, how do you like, how did
you get involved in curation?
Like, because, like, you're
like, the one thing I've noticed
is that, like, with every grail
shop, I'm like, dude, he's so
fucking on it.
Like, I'm like, how did like?
How did, yeah, dude.
So I would love to kind of just
unpack the story of like, what
made you want to dive into
curation so heavily?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so let me give
a Caveat and then answer your
questions.
So I always like to be
sensitive about Thinking of
myself as a curator because in
some respects I think that does
a disservice to professional, so
to speak, professional curators
who have a depth of
understanding about art history.
That that I do not, and so I
like to be Transparent and open
about that.
I think I play some version of
a contemporary curator At the
moment and what that really is,
and then I promise I'll answer
your question.
Yeah, but that really means to
me is that I Am a filter and I
do a lot of listening and
observing and I have my own
sense of taste, for sure, and
things, concepts, visual outputs
that I that I resonate with and
that I have strong personal
internal conviction about.
But I'm also very much a filter
for other smart people, great
collectors, other artists who
are sharing work of other
artists with me.
So so, without out of the way,
I have a pretty I've I took a
circuitous path to the work I'm
doing now.
So my academic training is in
Contemporary history,
interesting some, some art
history, some architectural
history, in fact, and then, at
the master's level, my focus was
on political ecology, which is
basically power dynamics Between
in, in many cases, farmers and
and government entities.
So, yeah, so and, of course,
like there are, there's a
relationship, you know, we in
with political ecology and
everything happening in crypto
and and digital art.
For sure, lots of, lots of
through lines Across one level
of fidelity Less so in other
ways Mm-hmm.
But you know, I finished my
masters and, as I was, as I was
doing so, kevin and I met Kevin.
Rose and I met In a pretty sort
of happenstance way and then,
over the course of the next
seven or so years, we worked
together building a couple of
technology products, so things
that were very aligned with our,
our passions, but that took a
manifestation in the form of a
mobile app.
So we built a nutrition product
and we built a meditation
product, things that were both
core to the way we were both
living and we saw some white
space and an opportunity to have
some impact a positive impact,
I hope, across those two, two
dimensions nutrition and
meditation and Digital art.
Nfts are not that different.
You know, it really started for
both of us from a deep passion
for all the incredible
Creativity that was being
expressed by these incredible
artists in this space, and we
were both obsessed with
collecting and getting to know
artists and we were spending, he
and I all of our time in this
space in 2021, while still
working in in web 2, as our
full-time jobs.
And and then there was an
opportunity really to make it
our full-time job to show up
more Holy and more effectively
across two dimensions both for
collectors like ourselves and to
build a community of collectors
that we can nurture and think
long-term and and Upskill
together.
All of us could learn together.
And then also, you know, by
spending all of our time here,
better support the artists who
we were starting to develop
these relationships with.
These aren't real human,
interpersonal relationships with
not transactional relationships
.
So, you know, that was really
the, the impetus to go all the
way in and start proof and the
proof collective, and start to
do things like Grails, which was
Kevin's idea, and I've sort of
helped steward afterwards.
So, again, to circle all the
way back, I'm very much still
learning and relying on smart
people, developing my own
sensibilities of taste and
curation and relying on people
much smarter than I am.
Speaker 1: Let me add, I'm going
to challenge you a little bit
here.
Yeah, go for it.
Do you think that curators, who
are designated curators in the
fine art world or in the art
history world, don't you think
that that, because of what I
hear a lot of, is that I'm sure
they still have people that are
a lot smarter than them, that
they look up to and that they
learn from, and that they still
need to bounce ideas off, and
primarily as a filter?
So would it be fair to say that
Maybe it's like an early day,
because I often find myself not
wanting to take credit for
things that are in the
traditional art history world.
I'm like, well, it's not fully
me, but what if this is just a
different version of it?
What if it's like an early day
where novices but couldn't we
actually call it a curate?
I mean, couldn't we?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think your
point is well taken.
I just like to be.
You know, some people think you
know words like that, labels
like that, titles like that are
loaded, and so I have no problem
.
I have no ego about who I am
showing up as in that sense.
So I like to sort of try to
call that out, that I'm
cognizant of the many things I
do not know.
That's really what I'm trying
to get to is, you know, being
aware of the things I know less
about, and, by extension, we'll
learn and acquire certain forms
of knowledge over time.
But I think to your point, or an
aspect of your point.
The other side of that is I'm I
and we and you know many others
who are in this space, including
artists and collectors we are
less dogmatic and indoctrinated
in the way that things have
previously been done, and to me
that's fundamental to being part
of a nascent movement.
You know, some of that lack of
indoctrination allows us to
think more openly and freely and
in novel ways, and that's
exciting to me.
That, I think, drives us all
forward.
I'm not saying this is
something I'm doing.
Holy, this is all of us, in
different ways, thinking in new
ways and collectively.
That energy is building
something, I think, very special
.
That wouldn't be possible if we
were, all you know, reserved
and unwilling to take risks
because, you know, we didn't
feel we were ready and didn't
have enough knowledge and hadn't
gone to art history, you know.
So the other side of it is very
exciting and, I think,
fundamental to this, being a
movement that has impact over
the long term, totally dude, and
just to share a little bit of
my personal like this made me
think I was thinking about this
when you were sharing it.
Speaker 1: I mean, when I first
started the podcast solo back in
2021, that was like my whole.
That was like my whole thing.
I had, like the dialogue around
me quote unquote being ready
was really strong, but the
desire to be a part of something
new was stronger and it kind of
drug my insecurities through
the fire.
And if you look at some of my
earlier podcasts, it was really
me just not saying a whole lot.
It was me just really just
asking people that I thought
were smarter than me questions
on it in a live and not
necessarily live, but, you know,
on a media outlet and learning
in public.
And Kevin Rose Kevin Rose's
podcast, talk about white space,
was actually the first podcast,
the only podcast I saw, that
was doing something similar that
I wanted to do.
I'm like, if this is the only
podcast centered around art,
like holy shit, there is so much
room to grow here.
You know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Like there's no, and
especially in the early 2021.
Speaker 1: days when people were
only talking about punks
mooning, apes mooning you know
world of women being dropped and
all these collectibles.
It was like, oh, let me just
quietly build this while
everyone's, you know, having fun
over here, and I'm, you know,
still having fun myself, but
recognizing the opportunity to,
like, do something, and Kevin
was a very big inspiration in
that, and especially in those
early days, you know doing that
you know what you know.
Speaker 2: What that brings up
for me is and maybe this is sort
of a through line through
through much of what we're
talking about is, you know,
kevin in in what Kevin as a
human, I think it's fair to say,
but in particular in those
podcasts around that period of
time, he was just deeply curious
.
Yeah, right, and so so he, you
know, he wanted to have people
on who could tell him and, by
extension, in audience space.
That was.
It was also curious about the
technology, about generative art
, about being an artist and
using blockchain in novel and
unique ways, and I think you
know, you and I and so many
others you know the space is a
hole in certain ways, but it's
about curiosity, yeah, and
through via curiosity, you
acquire new knowledge and you
listen to people outside of your
current remit of understanding
and circle of competence, yep,
and you expand that circle of
competence in so doing.
And so I love that anecdote
that his podcast was one of
those first ones you were
listening to and seeing.
Totally, it was yeah, it was.
Speaker 1: It was.
It was like the only one that I
saw, I mean outside of just
trading, and like at the time I
didn't have enough money to
really trade.
I didn't really.
I was like I was really poorly
managing my finances at the time
and so I just couldn't find an
authentic way to offer value and
it and.
But I wanted to be here, you
know, I just didn't know how to
participate, and that was that
was one of the biggest catalysts
to me, going like, fuck, like
he's the only one doing this.
There's got to be a lot of
other talented artists, you know
.
So, yeah, hats off to him for
that, because it was a.
That was really you know where
my roots were built, something
on the, on the through line of
generative art.
Here, though, something that
I've recently been curious about
.
You know, we have this, we have
this digital medium.
You know, the the art blocks
revolutionized the way
generative art was presented,
transacted, you know,
experienced, added a new layer,
and it really kind of had its
moment after, you know, decades
of just kind of being an art for
nerds, you know, and while it's
, it still is like I'm still a
complete nerd and I love it, but
it's.
It's a lot more respected is, I
guess, what I'm trying.
It brought a lot more respect
to the genre and the medium and
something that I, quite frankly,
didn't really understand,
especially in the early days,
and shout out to prohibition.
They were literally the reason
why I started getting into it,
because it was it was accessible
enough for me to afford to like
figure out my taste and what I
liked and what I didn't like.
But I'm rambling to get to a
point here around.
I recently bought the Demetri
Terniak LACMA Ringers LACMA
Edition output, and so the
physical representation of a
digital work is a topic that I
want to dive in on, because you
know, we, I still don't think
technology is at the point, at
least excessively outside of
Danvis, to where it's really
reasonable to buy a frame, and
so I think I saw a tweet of
yours, I can't remember when it
was around the display of the
display of generative art looks
better as a physical form or it
brings a new light to it.
So I'd love to kind of
understand, like, has your
thought process changed on that?
Have you?
Do you still believe that?
I'd love to kind of like dive
into that a little bit, yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, it's such
, it's such an interesting topic
.
There's a bunch of different
dimensions of it that I think
are interesting to talk about.
I think let's start with, you
know, with the, with the piece
around onboarding new collectors
, and you talked about it.
Like you know, generative art
was was basically entirely
disregarded as a from a
collector standpoint for 50
years you know something to that
effect except by a very small
number of collectors, including
the spalters are one of the the
the longest standing and most
significant collectors of
physical digital art and
generative art, computer code
art, but otherwise, you know,
mostly disregarded until the
last couple years, but, to your
point, still today.
There are two primary hurdles
at least one is most collectors,
even, you know, 25 to 40 year
old online internet native
collectors who have disposable
income.
The notion of the following two
things is hard to rock one,
that a computer and that code
generated these outputs and that
they live as a JPEG is like
just sort of hard, a difficult
mental model for many.
And then to that this lives on
a blockchain and that you
transact with crypto is like
this other dimension that is
also hard to rock.
I say all of that to get to to
this point that I think physical
prints and physical objects are
an increasingly interesting and
necessary half step to onboard
those collectors, that
demographic I just described,
ultimately over time into wholly
digital, wholly NFT, generative
art.
But that going from zero to 100
is probably a fool's errand.
So to go to you know someone
who's buying physical art today
and ask them to buy the JPEG of
a generative output tomorrow, I
think it is too challenging.
And so using physicals really
as an onboarding mechanism and
bringing them into the broader
ecosystem in so doing, for at
least that reason, I think
physicals are incredibly
interesting as a medium and as a
method to really expand the
opportunity for all digital
artists not not saying all
digital artists should do that,
right, for those who desire.
I think it's.
It's quite interesting and wise
.
There are so many other layers
of this right, Bruno, there's,
like you know, is it one
physical print per token and do
those move around together?
Can they be unbundled?
If unbundled, what does that
mean to the token Right?
And it's value relative to the
value of, like maybe a one of
one signed physical that was
made available to that token
holder?
So you know there's, there's a
lot there, but I think
fundamentally something like
prohibition.
Let's.
Let's use that example.
You know, I think the work they
are doing to make generative art
for artists more accessible is
is so important Right, it's,
it's essential and such an
important opportunity and
problem to solve.
But finding collectors for that
work that's being produced
there, I think, is a more
challenging task.
In some ways you can, you can
solve the supply and
accessibility side of it, but
the the demand for that work, I
think is challenging, given the
number of collectors who care
about generative art in our
space today and are set up and
willing to transact with either
on an L2 and buy a JPEG.
So you know, you can imagine if
the output of the work that was
generated via prohibition was a
physical product and yes, it
was fundamentally a token, it
was backed by a token.
But for a novice collector who
doesn't transact in ETH and
doesn't buy JPEG, if they could
just go there and print a
beautiful physical, yeah, you
know, maybe that's an
opportunity to really expand the
addressable market.
For what again is under the hood
?
You know, an NFT generated with
our blocks engine, but the end
user in some cases maybe, is
abstracted away from that a
little bit and over time is
brought along for that journey
of this is what an NFT means.
Hey, this piece that you bought
that's hanging in your house
now as a physical is backed in
these different ways and was
generated in these interesting
ways.
There's a lot there that we
could unpack, but I think as an
onboarding mechanism at half
step I'm super bullish on
physicals.
I really like that.
Speaker 1: And I look back to my
own experience with it, like
there is something really nice
about looking at this without
having it attached to any
internet device.
It like it's a completely
standalone object, and I've
found myself just like sitting
here and looking at it, kind of
in a meditation of just like
understanding, not even just
just.
I don't even know what I'm
really looking at, but there are
certain points to it that I'm
drawn at and I think you make a
really good point, because I
didn't really.
I mean, you know, the way I
understood crypto in general was
through art.
That was like the only way I
understood it.
That's how I was onboarded into
the space, but I'm also
incredibly digitally native, and
so I think I think your point
of like a half it's it's, you
know it's.
I think it's easy, because most
of us here are zero to a
hundred type of people.
You know it's like when we find
something, it's like okay, cool
, like we, we.
It may take us a while to cross
the chasm, but like, once we
cross, there's no half step.
It's like it's a hundred
percent or it's zero percent,
and I think that's one of the
challenges that I've also seen
with other people is that most
other people aren't like that
and it's taken me a really long
time to understand that most
people and you could call it,
call it crazy, call it psychotic
, call it whatever, call it
passionate.
You know, probably a healthy
blend of all of it, you know,
but most people like it takes a
lot and it's a huge risk.
It's a.
It's a.
It's a new art form made with
the computer.
It's challenging the
relationships of what humans and
technology and the relationship
that we have with it.
Who's the artist Is the token,
the art Is the code.
The art Is like.
What role does all of that play
in the creation of and how do we
value that?
You know, I think we're also
seeing that.
I mean, I feel like the rest of
the world will still take a
while to grapple with that
challenge, but I think we're
grappling with it, with native
AI works as well.
How do people value AI?
Like?
What does that even mean?
You know, and it's there's so
many through lines of generative
art in AI.
It's like you know, but I think
that's really where what I've
also noticed and Kind of where
we're pushing the boundaries, or
where a lot of collectors are
still trying to understand, like
you know, outside of clear
silver.
You know how do you value AI,
so it's it's really interesting
that this is a I know I kind of
went off into another topic here
, but it's interesting as a
second step, as an intermediary,
like physicals or something
people understand, and I think
that you know, and I'm not sure
if you agree with, like, I think
that's been one of the biggest
focuses of a lot of people here
Is, at least from what I've
noticed in the bear market, is
trying to meet people where
they're at, and I think, yeah,
it's really like that's really
our job here.
Speaker 2: you know, because, as
much as I love it here and I
love the tight little community
that we have, especially kind of
walking through fire of
Literally everything that
happened at 2023, we need more
people, you know yeah, yeah,
yeah, I mean that that point
around AI is is Such an
interesting one, and I think
that the it would not surprise
me if that's one of the primary
topics of this year is you know,
with the proliferation of, of
AI and and the ease with which
Almost anyone can create
visually interesting Images and
outputs, how do you
differentiate and what does it
mean to be the an artist using
AI in a thoughtful way, and how
do you value that as a, as a
collector?
You know, the obvious dimension
to fall back on is Provenance,
and you know how early, what was
this artist Experimenting with
these tools and producing work
in these ways?
But I think that that is only,
you know, one of many dimensions
that ultimately becomes
interesting as we think about
words that not are wholly
generated by AI and in some
cases, but but incorporate
elements Of AI and those tools.
I think that will will very
much be central to this year in
terms of the collector behavior.
And, you know, I think it would
not surprise me if a few of
those well-known names that and
you mentioned Claire, you know,
rupé Renisto, there's there, you
know, there's a handful, I
think that are sort of obvious
In terms of their distinct
aesthetic and their provenance
of having done this word for
some period of time.
But I really think we're gonna
see.
Maybe it's.
Maybe it's 10.
Maybe it's 15.
Maybe it's 20 amazing emerging
artists who are incorporating AI
in really novel ways and using
the tools and combining tools in
very novel ways.
That Will have it would not
surprise me very big years,
totally.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think we're
already seeing it with Delta
sauce.
You know, like, yeah, like
Delta sauce has been, you know
we've, we've had our like.
We've like Bernardo shout out
to Bernardo.
Bernardo's actually put him is
the one who put Delta sauce on
all of our radars and Bernardo
collected a lot of his super
early work and to watch him kind
of have his moment and people
really figure out who he is on
brain drops.
That was a really cool moment
and he uses AI to create the
objects.
But the composition is there.
There, there's, it's a, it's a
blend between AI objects and
Photoshop.
You know to where he aligns as
he puts things together.
It's not a hundred percent.
You know unique and what Rupai
Rene so did incredible, like
it's.
You can't, you just you can't
deny you know.
Did you see this?
Speaker 2: Did you see this
controversy?
You know, maybe it was a month
ago, it was right after Miami
around that piece that was Was
it AI or was it, you know, hand
painted, you know, yeah, yeah
yeah, totally totally so.
So you know, I mean that will be
.
I think another major topic
this coming year will be
Electors wanting to better
understand the process behind
how these pieces were created.
At the moment, that that's
almost wholly abstracted away
from the end user.
They, they just consume the
yeah, the visual output of of
this process.
But you know, you can, I think
there's an opportunity and
someone will build it.
Maybe we will, who knows?
But to At the moment you can
verify who minted a piece of
work right, who, who, who was
the creator of the work, but you
cannot, with any Fidelity,
verify how the work was created
itself and so you can imagine
you know, maybe you know, if
some of these tools had web 3
Plugins you could.
Then you know the creators,
while it is connected to these
tools, and then, by extension,
you can very easily verify who
created and how.
And now all of that Information
is contained in the collection,
in the tokens, because you know
, I think that will be a big
topic this year is I see a
beautiful visual output.
I Want to know precisely the
process that went into creating
it, you know and you bring up.
Speaker 1: This is a great point
, and I think, to touch on
Claire a little bit, she talks
about taste is the new.
You know, tastes, the skill you
know, and it's like, I think,
with AI, at least in the
beginning, like because I think
you're talking about the next
step, I think you're talking
about step two.
I think because where we're at
with step one is, you know, in
order to understand a lot of
this new technology, you have to
play with it and to ask people
to actually play with it with
the amount of other things that
we're already doing, there's
only so much attention we can
spend.
You know, we only have, like we
wake up with a certain amount
of energy each day and we can
all.
It's a very finite resource and
To like put the onus a hundred
percent on collectors, we'll,
like we'll just start making AI
work.
Then you'll understand, kind of
how it's made and it's like,
while that is true I mean
there's this not false it's kind
of not really on.
The collectors shouldn't have
to like dive deep into AI
tooling and understand Very
similar to crypto as well.
Like we can't expect the
average person to go read the
Bitcoin white paper, like, we
can't like, it's just not gonna
happen, you know yeah yeah, and
it's the same with generative
art, right.
Speaker 2: I mean we don't ask
people to go under the hood,
although I can make the case
that we should do more of that.
You know, I think that's a
proof we should do more of of
that bring people under the hood
so they can understand why the
project a is maybe interesting
relative to project B, but
that's not a requirement for
generative art collectors to
understand how the script is
written and why it might be
interesting.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I mean, for
someone like me though, I'm
interested in that, so I'm
naturally gonna do it, and so if
I have a natural interest, I'm
gonna do it.
But I think you're very much
right on the, on the broad scope
.
It's not really fair To ask
that, to demand that of
collectors, and I think that
having some tooling in the
creation process of how it's
made We'll really matter to some
people and that was a yeah, I
remember that controversy that
was.
That was quite the.
That was quite the hot topic.
And I think you know I go back
and forth between both camps.
You know, on one side, I really
feel like they should have
disclosed that part of it was
made with AI, but on the other
end, if the art makes you feel
good when you buy it, does it
really fucking matter?
You know, like, yeah, I mean I
was back to these.
Speaker 2: That goes back to
these dimensions we talked about
, like how much context do you
need or not?
And I think that you know
that's probably a sort of
collector by collector Calculus,
right, it's like for some
collectors it's holy about how a
piece makes them feel and for
others you know they want that
additional context.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I've often,
you know, this is the challenge
that I feel like, I think
Especially us in positions that
we're at and a lot of people in
general like are facing.
It's like, how do you Because
art is so subjective, it's so
nuanced, there's like, even
going back to the, to the topic
on prints, you know, does that
if you, you know, with the
fedenzas, like that's the most
easy, as the easiest, you know,
target here is that if you have
the print, is the token still
worth it?
And how do you?
Some people it really matters
and some people it really
doesn't how do you build for
both?
Speaker 2: You know, you know,
you know what's funny is I know
a collector who he owned a
fedenza and he he redeemed the
print that came with that
fedenza and so he, he has this
beautiful, framed, I think,
signed fedenza print in his home
and then he sold the token.
And his life experience, I
would argue, is net positive
from those steps he just took,
because every day in his office
he gets to experience this
artwork, in the same way, maybe,
or in similar ways to the way
that you experience your
churnyak Print, that's, that's
in your space there.
So he gets to experience this
work of art every day, this
beautiful print, high quality
print, and he sold the token.
I'm sure, if I'm not wrong, he
sold the token, I'm sure, for,
for you know, a great return on
what he minted it for, of course
.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and so it is
tough.
It's tough and Because you can
also look at.
Like you know, rhinotic made a
tweet about this.
I just did this on one of our
spaces.
He's like what's really cool
about digital art is that I
don't the digital art movement,
especially with what we're
playing on, is I don't have to
go to a museum To to go
appreciate art, like the art
doesn't have to be in my wallet
or I don't have to go some place
.
There's no, there's no friction
to me Appreciating art of this
movement, it's all.
I can just log on to my
computer and whether it's in my
wallet or not, it really doesn't
matter.
Um, I thought that was a great
point that he brought up and it
kind of smashed the delusion of
like I have to own this to
appreciate it, you know.
But, um, I think your friend
made out Well, and, as long as
the person's happy, what if that
person who bought it Obviously
didn't give two shits about the
physical?
You know, like they just wanted
to be digitally native and
owning the token is more
important to them.
Yeah, someone interesting.
You know fellowship, you know
fellowship, trust.
They've done something.
It went very unnoticed and
under the radar, which is kind
of upsetting to me.
So I like one thing that they
did that was really interesting
and they did it with Rupi Rini
sto, they did it with a few and
they did with a few other
artists that worked with them is
they created what was called a
print shop and they created
their own print shop and they,
to people who had certain
collections, they would air drop
print token and if you were to,
basically what that did is that
you could allow the print token
one you could.
You could enable it or burn it
one time.
So what it allowed people to do
is, if they really didn't want
the physical, they could keep
the print token With the actual
NFT itself and you could
actually see whether it had been
redeemed or not.
Therefore, it was kind of a
step in the right direction to
easily you don't have to like,
go through the trust of like,
did you print it, did you not?
You know, did you very you know
it's all it's all bundled
together and you can see if it
was used or not, and I thought
that was kind of an interesting
way for people to collect both
at the same time and really kind
of help people in both camps
make.
You know, make that decision.
Speaker 2: But yeah, I love that
.
I'm just looking it up right
now.
So the fellowship print deeds.
Print deeds.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that, that's
super cool.
So the fellowship print deed is
an NFT that symbolizes your
exclusive right to acquire an
addition to print at a cost From
a specific artwork within a
collection released by
fellowship.
It can be stored, used to order
your print or be actively
traded on the secondary market.
That's cool.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so you can sell
the print deed itself.
You know, like on a secondary
market and keep the and keep the
token.
So if someone just wanted the
print but they didn't want the
NFT, you could sell them the the
print deed.
Speaker 2: Oh and, and they can
print your NFT, or they can
print, yeah, that they own, no
only the one that's assigned to
that print deed.
Speaker 1: So they did it very
limited to where everything that
was dropped it was only for
that specific artwork that it
was dropped to.
At least my understanding so
yeah, like if someone just
wanted to buy the physical off
of you, you could then literally
sell them a physical and not
sell them the digital.
You know, or you could sell,
yeah, you know, or it did you
get that school, so I don't know
but it went widely on notice
and I'm like how are people like
, dude, this is so cool, like
this is actually Innovative, you
know, like this is a, it's just
something real that we've been
really struggling with
Understanding how to navigate
for such a long time?
Um, you so, yeah, shout out
shout out, shout out, fellowship
on that.
Yeah, they're killing it.
Speaker 2: I love fellowship.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, for sure,
I mean they've, uh, yeah, we
can get into it, like me.
I mean talk about AI, like they
are on both ends of the
intersection of AI and
photography, and I had actually
had Alejandro on season one, um,
to talk about a lot of this man
.
He's such a brilliant
photographer, brilliant mind,
brilliant, guy Um, and the way
they're doing is that they're
they're onboarding Traditional
kind of whales, like you know
Joel Meyer, whitz and Greg
recruits in and a lot of the you
know, and guy Bourdine, um, uh,
they're tokenizing a lot of the
works, but on the other side,
they're like, completely on both
extremes of the spectrum,
they're like devoting so much
resources and time and knowledge
into curating AI art and AI
photography.
Yeah, um, yeah, so it's
incredible, man, um, it's
amazing.
But, dude, we've kind of run
the gamut here.
One thing I really want to what?
Another topic I really want to
talk about is in your bio, uh,
and it's something I learned
about in Miami is you're a
former rice boy, um, so I, I got
.
I want to lighten up, maybe
talk about less about what.
Three here and where we go wind
it in there.
But what, like what is your
obsession with rice man?
Or like what, what is your
relationship?
Right, I should say yeah.
Speaker 2: So I told you that,
uh, my masters was, was focused
on political ecology, which is
the relationship between, uh, in
many cases, farmers and
government, uh ent entities and,
um, you know, when you're doing
a master's, you choose a very
specific, highly, highly focused
um area uh to to study.
And so, uh, I have always been
fascinated by food and farming
and um health food and um
medicinal mushrooms, all sorts
of things.
I lived in in Hawaii for six
months and was on a farm that
entire time and we were growing
25 varieties of bananas, and so
we had, you know, this diversity
of different foods that I was
fascinated by, and all around
this notion of um permaculture
and agro biodiversity, these two
schools of thought.
So, during my masters, um, my
very specific focus was on the
way that these very small holder
farmers, like you know, very,
very meager um livelihoods and
very challenging livelihoods,
the way that, in South India,
these farmers were using ancient
varieties of rice, of which
there are thousands, as a way to
sort of reassert their agency
and their sovereignty and,
fundamentally, sort of rebuild
their sense of self and self
respect, relative to the
subsidized forms of rice that
are typically cultivated in
those regions where the
government provides this rice at
a discount but then also
demands that, by extension, you
use chemical fertilizers on your
uh, on your farm, to cultivate
that rice.
And so there's this growing
faction of farmers in that
region, in South India and
elsewhere who are um taking up
seed, saving and sharing these
seeds amongst themselves and uh
doing so, as I said, sort of as
a way to reassert themselves and
um their sense of self uh in
that equation.
So that's the rice boy um
chapter.
I mean it was just to give a
little bit more color to that.
You know, we spent I think two
months in South India myself, a
translator and a driver, and my
colleague going into very remote
rural areas of South India and
talking to those farmers.
You know they'd bring us into
their, their very small homes
and always share tea, sometimes
food, together and learn about
their livelihoods, learn about
the challenges and drought is a
huge issue Um there's an
epidemic of farmer suicides
where there was at that time,
given how challenging their
livelihoods are.
So I mean that was a pretty
beautiful uh experience to get
to spend so much time with those
farmers in their homes and
learn about their lives and the
reason I said initially there's
a through line to the work that
I'm doing now is like one, yes,
those sort of power dynamics and
the way that sort of crypto
represents some of those or
stands for some of those same
same things, but also in terms
of just being a?
Um, a listener and being open
minded to.
You know, learn from others, and
that could be others like
yourself, boona and the Schiller
team hanging out in Miami.
That could be artists and
learning about what makes them
tick and sure, learning about
their challenges and their
creative process and doing so,
uh, with with very few value
judge judgments and just being
open minded.
Um, so that is the rice boy uh
chapter, and I have somewhere
back there, I have this
beautiful handmade gift from one
of the farmers we visited.
He creates from these ancient
varieties of rice, oh, no shit,
uh, kind of sculptures.
I'll send you a picture
afterwards, later, please, so
that that that follows me around
.
Speaker 1: I love that dude.
Uh no, and I think, honestly,
man, the way we kind of ended,
we ended this conversation right
where we started, so I think I
want to like tie a bow on it and
wrap it up here, uh, cause I
couldn't think of a better way
to end it on that note, um and
so I guess the the last bit here
.
First and foremost, man, just
thanks for your time.
Um, glad we were able to get
scheduled.
This has been a fun hour, uh,
you know.
And so I guess, as we wrap it
up, you know, would love to kind
of start looking into the
future a little bit.
You know, I know we talked about
some of the centralized themes
of some of the dialogues we're
going to be having this year,
but kind of more with you and
proof with what you can share.
Um, what is it that you're like
like, most looking forward to
in 2024?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think so.
I think 2024 for us, it um is
really about focus, um, and you
know, prioritizing quality Um
and that probably means, you
know, a a reasonable cadence of
releases with exceptional
artists, with thoughtful supply,
uh, for each of those releases.
You know we'll continue to do
our drill shows, for sure those
are, those are really important
and fundamental to to what we're
doing in the storytelling part
that we, that we talked about.
But you know, doing a number of
solo exhibitions and solo
releases with very much top tier
artists, that um that we've
worked with in the past in most
cases and um, and then doing
leaving enough space amongst
those things to experiment, and
you know we have some fun ideas,
both in terms of partnerships
and with with some artists who
have not done anything in this
space yet, uh, and it's
exploring things on ordinal,
like you know.
Leaving space to experiment and
and innovate, because you know,
as I look ahead to to next year
, the idea and the notion of
whole of only exclusively
selling uh and platforming JPEGs
is fine but not compelling and
doesn't get me out of out of bed
in the morning.
So, leaving enough space to
experiment and innovate, uh,
while still being focused.
Focus is the primary uh
objective for this year.
Uh, I think you know it's going
to be really exciting year ahead
.
I think so too, man.
Speaker 1: And I, you know, I, I
, as as much as I hated the bear
market, I think it was a lot
easier.
There was a, there was a level
of focus that we weren't
distracted by the next shiny
object.
Uh, you know.
So I think that's a perfect, uh
, I guess company, you could
call a resolution, uh, or
through a line or a topic, to
like it's, like it's it, because
it's it's hard, you know it's,
it's so hard with the shiny
objects that are, that are being
built here, um, and with all
the amazing artwork that's being
produced.
So, um, I think it's fantastic.
Man, uh, is there anywhere?
Like go ahead?
Speaker 2: No, I was just going
to say, uh, he, as we wrap, just
to to send some flowers back to
you guys and you, Boona, um,
this has been a lot of fun.
All of the work you guys are
doing is thoughtful and
intentional and and I know
you're sort of growing at a very
intentional pace and and being
uh very considered about who you
work with and how and uh and uh
, it's much needed and deeply
appreciated, man.
Speaker 1: Dude, and, and you
know what, everyone on our team,
including myself, is incredibly
, uh, challenged when it comes
to taking compliments, um, so I,
I very much appreciate that.
Man.
It really means a lot to see,
you know, cause a lot, of, a lot
of the stuff we don't really
say we do, we just do it and to
see someone kind of pick up on
the way we try to move or the
way we'd like to be seen, um, it
means a lot, man.
Uh, you're yeah.
So yeah, just yeah thank you.
Speaker 2: Um, you've got to get
, you've got.
You've got to get better at
taking compliments.
I know it's hard.
Speaker 1: That's going to be me
for 2024.
It's it's getting better at
accepting, accepting compliments
, uh, and, and I'm going to, I'm
going to steal yours, just
staying focused, because I have
a feeling there's going to be a
lot of uh, shiny distractions
this year.
So, um, but, dude, yeah, this
is great.
Is there anywhere where people
lastly want to give you a plug,
where people can follow you?
Uh, where do you people want?
Where do you want people to go
first?
Speaker 2: No, go follow Boona
instead.
Dude off man All right?
Speaker 1: Uh well, dude, thank
you so much, man.
Uh, Eli, this has been a treat,
and hang out for just a little
bit.
We'll let it finish uploading
and, uh, we'll call it a rat man
, but I hope you have a great
rest of your day, man.
Thanks, man, you too.
Thank you for listening to the
Schiller curated podcast.
We hope you enjoyed the
conversation.
As we close that today's
episode, don't forget to
subscribe to our podcast on your
favorite platform and leave a
five star review to help ensure
you never miss an episode and to
help others discover the
curated podcast as well.
To stay updated on our upcoming
episodes, as well as our weekly
Twitter space schedule, be sure
to follow us on X, formerly
known as Twitter, at Schiller
XYZ.
Once again, thank you for
tuning in and remember, if
you're looking for it art is
everywhere and it's up to us to
appreciate and explore the
emotions it brings to our lives.
Until next time, this is Boona
Signing off.